In 2025, Safety Net was once again an excellent resource for evaluating the safety of a company’s dividend.

During the year, 10 stocks were rated “A” for dividend safety. None of them cut their dividends. In fact, since 2023, not one of the 29 “A”-rated stocks has lowered its payout within a year after we evaluated it.

Even more impressive, 50% of 2025’s “A”-rated stocks boosted their dividends during the year, including Iron Mountain (NYSE: IRM), which raised its dividend by 10% six months after my “A” rating was released, Delek Logistics Partners (NYSE: DKL), which raised its distribution each quarter, and MPLX (NYSE: MPLX), which hiked its payout by 12% less than a week after I gave it an “A” rating.

I only gave four stocks a “B” for dividend safety in 2025, but two of them boosted their dividends, while the other two kept them the same. There were no cuts.

Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET) was rated “B” in April and raised its distribution every quarter in 2025.

There were seven stocks whose dividends were considered to have a moderate risk of being cut, receiving a “C” rating. Two raised their dividends; two cut them. The average change to the dividend of those seven stocks was -10.6%.

There were a handful of cuts among the “D” and “F”-rated stocks as well. We gave 12 stocks a “D” grade, and 17 others were rated “F.” Two out of the 12 “D”s lowered their dividends, while three out of the 17 “F”s did so.

“D”-rated stocks had the biggest average drop at 12.4%. “F”-rated stocks only saw a 6.4% average decline, but that number is skewed a bit by one variable dividend that saw a sizable – yet likely temporary – increase.

Back in February, Stellantis (NYSE: STLA) slashed its dividend by more than 50% a week after I issued a “D” rating on the stock.

Advanced Flower Capital’s (Nasdaq: AFCG) dividend wilted in 2025. After I gave it a “D” rating, management proved me right by cutting the dividend twice and then skipping it altogether in the fourth quarter.

In June, Research Analyst John Oravec said there was a strong likelihood that OFS Capital (Nasdaq: OFS) would “have a repeat of 2020 with a cut coming down the line” before slapping the stock with an “F” rating. The dividend was cut in half in December.

All in all, it was another terrific year for Safety Net.

Thanks to all of you who submitted requests for stocks to be evaluated in the Safety Net column. Keep them coming! Leave the ticker symbols in the comments section below.

You can also check to see if I’ve rated your favorite dividend payer recently. Just type the company name in the search box in the upper-right corner of this page, and hit “enter.”

The post Safety Net: The Great Dividend Predictor appeared first on Wealthy Retirement.

In this special “new year” edition of Wealthy Retirement, we’re running a stock through the Safety Net model and The Value Meter… at the same time.

Using these two popular methodologies in tandem – one for dividend safety, the other for valuation – can give us a more complete picture of whether a stock is worth investing in.

Without further ado, here’s the first-ever combined edition of Safety Net and The Value Meter… featuring a company that just made a potentially industry-changing announcement.

Chief Income Strategist Marc Lichtenfeld

Safety Net

Now that the calendar has turned to 2026, lots of folks are making promises to themselves that they won’t keep. However, one resolution just got much easier.

Losing weight.

GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) drugs have been game changers for patients and the pharmaceutical companies that make them. Now, oral GLP-1 drugs will again move the needle significantly for customers and drugmakers.

Last week, Danish pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk (NYSE: NVO) received FDA approval for an oral version of Wegovy, which was previously available by injection only. The change to the company’s financial picture will be momentous.

We won’t have the full 2025 figures until next month, but free cash flow is projected to come in at $7.7 billion, a 28% decline from 2024’s $10.7 billion and 36% below 2023’s total.

However, because of the new approval, free cash flow is expected to jump 34% to $10.3 billion in 2026 and another 27% in 2027 to $13.2 billion.

The sharp decline in 2025’s free cash flow costs Novo Nordisk a couple of points on its dividend safety rating.

Another issue is the payout ratio.

Novo Nordisk is expected to have paid shareholders $7.1 billion in dividends in 2025. If free cash flow slid 28% as projected, the payout ratio would rise to 92%, which is way too high.

This year’s projected $8.1 billion in dividends would lead to a payout ratio of 78% based on the consensus cash flow estimate. That is also too high, but it’s within spitting distance of the 75% threshold for Safety Net. If cash flow is a little higher than expected (or dividends paid is a little lower) in 2026, the payout ratio may come in below the 75% level, and the company would not be penalized.

In 2025, American investors received two semiannual dividends totaling $1.73 per share, which comes out to a 3.3% dividend yield.

In its local currency, the Danish krone, Novo Nordisk has raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years – though American investors may have seen slight reductions because of currency fluctuations.

Due to falling cash flow and a too-high payout ratio, Novo Nordisk’s dividend safety rating is low. But this is an unusual situation with the company’s fortunes about to change dramatically due to oral Wegovy.

Combine that with a three-decade run of annual dividend increases and a likely upgrade this year, and the dividend should be okay despite the poor rating.

Dividend Safety Rating: D

Director of Trading Anthony Summers

The Value Meter

Sometimes the best businesses make only decent stocks – not because the company slips, but because expectations outrun what the cash can reasonably deliver.

That’s the situation with Novo Nordisk today. The business is still excellent. The stock, after a long reset, is finally being treated with more discipline.

The company is the unquestioned global leader in diabetes and obesity treatments. And Ozempic and Wegovy – overnight name brands, it seems – have reshaped how investors think about the company.

For a while, the market assumed that dominance meant inevitability. But recent results remind us that even great businesses have limits.

Over the first nine months of 2025, sales rose 12%, or 15% at constant exchange rates. Operating profit increased 5%, held back by roughly 9 billion kroner (roughly $1.4 billion) in restructuring costs tied to a companywide transformation. Free cash flow came in at 63.9 billion kroner (about $10.1 billion). That’s lower than the previous year, but still substantial.

Capital spending climbed as Novo expanded its manufacturing capacity. That spending isn’t optional. It’s the cost of staying competitive in GLP-1 therapies. Management also narrowed guidance and lowered growth expectations for diabetes and obesity treatments.

Novo trades at an enterprise value-to-net asset value ratio of 8.43, well above the universe average of 3.82. On that metric alone, the stock still looks expensive. The market continues to pay a premium for quality.

Cash flow is what keeps that premium from becoming a problem. Novo generates quarterly free cash flow equal to 11.28% of its net asset value. The universe average is just 1.12%. In plain terms, the company turns its assets into cash about 10 times more efficiently than the typical company. That matters.

Novo is consistent too. While the Safety Net model rewards year-over-year cash flow growth, The Value Meter prioritizes quarter-over-quarter growth. Over the past 12 quarters, the company grew its quarterly free cash flow 54.5% of the time, compared with 46.7% for peers. It also produced positive free cash flow in each of the past 12 quarters.

This isn’t a lucky stretch. It’s a durable pattern.

As we saw above, however, the stock has gone through a humbling year. Shares peaked in mid-2024 and slid through much of 2025.

That move wasn’t driven by collapsing fundamentals. It was driven by disappointment. Investors stopped paying for perfection.

That change is important. Novo is not cheap in absolute terms. You are still paying for elite assets. But you are no longer paying as if nothing can go wrong.

The business earns its valuation. The balance sheet is strong. The cash engine is real. What’s different now is the margin of safety. After the sell-off, it finally exists.

This isn’t a stock for traders chasing excitement. It’s for patient investors who want exposure to a world-class cash producer after expectations have cooled. The upside may be quieter from here, but it no longer depends on flawless execution.

The Value Meter rates Novo Nordisk as “Slightly Undervalued.”

The post Novo Nordisk: What’s Next for the Pharma Giant? appeared first on Wealthy Retirement.

The most important element to investing success is not stock-picking ability – it’s time. The longer you’re invested, the more money you will make.

Consider this…

A $10,000 investment in dividend growth stocks with a starting yield of 4%, dividend growth of 8% per year, and price appreciation that rises in line with the historical average of the S&P 500 is worth $17,757 after five years.

After 10 years, it’s worth $31,572.

After 15 years, you’re sitting on $56,208.

At year 20, your $10,000 has turned into $100,195.

Hold for another 10 years, and you’ve got $319,613.

And if you stayed invested for 40 years, you’d have $1,024,893.

That’s the power of compounding and time.

Legendary investor and trader Jesse Livermore once remarked, “It was never my thinking that made the big money for me. It was always my sitting.”

In fact, a Fidelity study commissioned years ago looked at its accounts to see if it could identify common traits among its most successful investors. What it found was remarkable.

The best-performing accounts belonged to investors who either were dead or had forgotten they had accounts.

Among the thousands of accounts that Fidelity looked at, the ones that just sat there – that weren’t touched – had the best results.

The biggest favor you can do for yourself as an investor is to put money into stocks and then do nothing (or very little) for as long as possible.

And if you want to leave a legacy for your children or grandchildren, do the same for them.

Can you imagine how you’ll be remembered if your grandchild has an account that you set up 40 years prior, and that money – which may not have been much when you funded it – can now help them buy a house, fund their child’s education, or even set up the next generation the way you did?

They say that in life, timing is everything.

But in the market, what’s more important is time. Regardless of how tough the markets might be, give yourself and your family the gift of time for your investments to grow.

The post How to Make Millions by Doing Nothing appeared first on Wealthy Retirement.

Gladstone is a real estate investment trust that owns and rents out 151 industrial and office properties in 27 states.

For example…

• It leases 241,000 square feet to Berry Global in Jackson, Tennessee
• It leases 115,000 square feet to Eastern Metal Supply Holdings in Charlotte, North Carolina
• It leases 120,000 square feet to Corning in Horseheads, New York.

Last year, funds from operations (FFO), a measure of cash flow used by REITs, grew by 0.8% to $59.2 million. This year, the growth rate is expected to be nearly identical, as FFO is forecast to rise to $59.7 million. However, that is still lower than 2022’s $60.6 million.

Safety Net wants to see cash flow growth over both one- and three-year periods.

The numbers are close, though, so if FFO comes in a little over expectations, it could show positive growth over three years.

The bigger problem is Gladstone Commercial pays out more in dividends than it takes in.

Last year, the company paid shareholders $62.8 million while generating $59.2 million in FFO. In other words, it paid $1.06 in dividends for every $1 in FFO.

This year, that’s forecast to dip to $1.04.

We always want dividends paid to be below cash flow. Otherwise the company has to dip into cash, borrow money, or sell stock to afford the difference.

Gladstone Commercial pays a $0.10 monthly dividend, which comes out to an impressive 11% yield.

However, there was a cut recently. At the beginning of 2023, management lowered the dividend to the current rate from $0.1254 per share.

So the company can’t afford its dividend, and management showed a willingness to cut the payout less than three years ago.

Until FFO exceeds what the company is paying out, Gladstone Commercial’s dividend is not safe.

Dividend Safety Rating: F

What stock’s dividend safety would you like me to analyze next? Leave the ticker in the comments section.

You can also take a look to see whether we’ve written about your favorite stock recently. Just click on the word “Search” at the top right part of the Wealthy Retirementhomepage, type in the company name, and hit “Enter.”

Also, keep in mind that Safety Net can analyze only individual stocks, not exchange-traded funds, mutual funds, or closed-end funds.

The post Is This Company’s Dividend as “GOOD” as Its Ticker? appeared first on Wealthy Retirement.

The breakfast staple’s sky-high prices may have even shifted the presidential election in 2024. By the time voters went to the polls, egg prices were up 46% since the beginning of the year.

Rising prices caused Cal-Maine Foods‘ (Nasdaq: CALM) cash flow to blow the roof off of the hen house. That enabled the company to pay shareholders $8.72 in dividends in 2025, which comes out to a 10.2% yield.

But can the company continue to pay such an eggcellent yield?

Cal-Maine Foods is the largest producer of eggs in the United States, with a 14% market share.

In fiscal 2025, which ended in May, the company’s free cash flow exploded like a hard-boiled egg left on the stove all day, growing 250% from $304 million the prior year to $1.06 billion.

This fiscal year, however, free cash flow is eggspected to be sliced in half to $512 million. That’s not only lower than last year’s total, but it’s significantly lower than 2023’s number.

In the last fiscal year, Cal-Maine paid shareholders $330 million in dividends for a low 31% payout ratio. But this year could be a problem. Wall Street forecasts $789 million in dividends, which is 1 1/2 times the expected amount of cash flow.

So the company’s free cash flow is shrinking, and this year it won’t support the projected dividend payment.

But the biggest threat to the company’s payout is its dividend policy.

Cal-Maine has a variable policy. It pays one-third of its quarterly profits to shareholders in dividends.

On an earnings per share basis, profits are forecast to drop 60% this year.

Any company with a variable dividend policy is going to see fluctuations in its dividend. Cal-Maine’s payout has already been cut in each of the past two quarters, falling from $3.50 in May to $1.38 in November.

Now that the price of eggs has come down, bringing Cal-Maine’s earnings and cash flow with it, the company’s dividend is sure to follow.

Dividend Safety Rating: F

What stock’s dividend safety would you like me to analyze next? Leave the ticker in the comments section.

You can also take a look to see whether we’ve written about your favorite stock recently. Just click on the word “Search” at the top right part of the Wealthy Retirement homepage, type in the company name, and hit “Enter.”

Also, keep in mind that Safety Net can analyze only individual stocks, not exchange-traded funds, mutual funds, or closed-end funds.

The post Is Cal-Maine’s 10% Yield About to Go Splat? appeared first on Wealthy Retirement.

It’s the kind of result everyone who’s ever been involved in a startup dreams of.

I’m happy for him. He’s worked incredibly hard over the past 10 years and spent a lot of time on the road away from his family.

But he could have done even better.

Let me explain.

When he started, he was given a small percentage of the company. But he also invested his own money in the business in order to hold a larger stake.

He invested $250,000 and will just about double his money.

However, had he simply put that money into the S&P 500, it would now be worth $723,750.

My buddy put a decent amount of his net worth into one new and speculative company. If he’d invested in the S&P, he’d be betting on hundreds of America’s best businesses.

Perhaps he wouldn’t have known to select Nvidia (Nasdaq: NVDA) as a stock to buy 10 years ago. But by owning the S&P 500, he would have had exposure to it as it became one of America’s hottest companies and stocks. He’d also have owned huge winners like Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL), Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY), Costco (Nasdaq: COST), and many others.

He would’ve experienced the power of compounding dividends as well. Over the last 10 years, dividend income was responsible for 23% of the market’s total return. That’s consistent with the 24% of the S&P 500’s average monthly total return that dividends have accounted for since 1957.

By betting $250,000 on that one company, he missed out on roughly 23% more returns by the simple fact that he wasn’t paid a dividend like he would’ve received from the broad index.

I see investors make similar mistakes all the time as they try to pick the right stocks. Sure, owning top-performing stocks can be lucrative (and I’ll admit that it’s fun owning individual stocks). For most people, however, owning a diversified group of index funds or ETFs is the best way to go.

Markets go up over the long term, and if you own the broad indexes, you’ll participate in those gains. But if your focus is too narrow, you have a good chance of missing out.

Make sure you’re receiving some dividends too. They will substantially boost your return over the long term, and they make bear markets easier to handle when they occur.

If my friend had asked me what I thought before he committed that cash a decade ago, he’d be sitting on about a quarter of a million dollars more – and he would’ve had a lot less stress about whether he was ever going to get his money out.

Investing doesn’t have to be complicated. Own the broad indexes and collect dividends. Over the long term, your returns will be strong and your stress will be lowered.

The post My Friend’s $250,000 Mistake appeared first on Wealthy Retirement.

But can investors rely on the hefty yield while they wait for the stock price to recover?

In fiscal 2024, which ended in February, free cash flow actually increased due to a sharp reduction in capital expenditures (or “capex”) despite declining revenue and profits.

Cash flow from operations fell from $8.6 billion to $7.4 billion in fiscal 2024, but a 40% cut in capex boosted free cash flow by 17% from $3.8 billion to $4.5 billion.

In fiscal 2025, which ends this coming February, capex is forecast to rise by more than $1 billion, which will reduce free cash flow to $2.5 billion.

In fiscal 2024, Target paid $2 billion in dividends for a very comfortable payout ratio of 46%. This year, the retail giant is forecast to pay a little over $2.1 billion. With drastically falling free cash flow, the payout ratio jumps to an uncomfortable 87%.

However, Target has an incredible dividend-paying history. It has raised its dividend every year since 1972. I was still watching Sesame Street back then.

Since the company is a member of the S&P 500 and has raised its dividend for more than 25 years in a row, it is considered a Dividend Aristocrat, which is a prestigious label that attracts income investors.

Target’s numbers are all going in the wrong direction. Free cash flow is down over the past three years and is expected to fall sharply this fiscal year. As a result, the payout ratio in fiscal 2025 is now projected to be above my 75% threshold.

It’s becoming more difficult for Target to afford its dividend.

I suspect that the five-and-a-half-decade run of annual dividend increases is pretty important to management and they’re going to do what it takes to continue to boost the payout to shareholders.

But if free cash flow continues to deteriorate, Target may have a tough decision to make regarding that very long and impressive dividend-hiking track record.

I don’t suspect a dividend cut is imminent, but given the company’s cash flow situation, the payout can’t be considered safe – even for a Dividend Aristocrat.

Dividend Safety Rating: D

What stock’s dividend safety would you like me to analyze next? Leave the ticker in the comments section.

You can also take a look to see whether we’ve written about your favorite stock recently. Just click on the word “Search” at the top right part of the Wealthy Retirement homepage, type in the company name, and hit “Enter.”

Also, keep in mind that Safety Net can analyze only individual stocks, not exchange-traded funds, mutual funds, or closed-end funds.

The post Is This Dividend Aristocrat’s Payout in Jeopardy? appeared first on Wealthy Retirement.

The reason for my skepticism is risk.

When a company pays a double-digit yield, the risk is higher that the stock is going to perform badly or the dividend is going to be cut. It’s not a guarantee that those things will happen, but it is more likely to happen than when the dividend yield is lower.

With that knowledge, let’s find out whether 15% yielder Dynex Capital (NYSE: DX) is in danger of cutting its dividend.

Dynex Capital is a mortgage REIT. It borrows money and then lends it out at higher interest rates. The difference, after expenses, is called net interest income.

Last year, Dynex generated $5.9 million in net interest income while paying out $117.8 million in dividends. That means it paid 20 times more cash in dividends than it took in.

This year, I expect net interest income to rise significantly to $94.5 million. However, dividends paid are still forecast to be substantially higher at $133.2 million.

The dividend track record isn’t great either. Though Dynex has raised the monthly dividend twice in the past year from $0.13 per share to $0.17, it is still well below where it was 10 years ago.

At the time, Dynex paid a quarterly dividend of $0.72, which is 41% more than the current monthly dividend extrapolated to a quarterly dividend ($0.17 per month equals $0.51 per quarter). That $0.72 per share dividend in 2015 was cut to $0.63 in early 2016, and the company lowered the dividend again in 2017 to $0.54.

Two years later, Dynex began paying a monthly dividend, reducing it again to $0.15 ($0.45 quarterly) in mid-2019 and once more to $0.13 ($0.39 quarterly) in 2020.

So we have a stock that can’t afford its dividend and has cut the payout four times in the past 10 years.

Dynex Capital will very likely cut its dividend again soon.

The dividend is not safe.

Dividend Safety Rating: F

What stock’s dividend safety would you like me to analyze next? Leave the ticker in the comments section.

You can also take a look to see whether we’ve written about your favorite stock recently. Just click on the word “Search” at the top right part of the Wealthy Retirement homepage, type in the company name, and hit “Enter.”

Also, keep in mind that Safety Net can analyze only individual stocks, not exchange-traded funds, mutual funds, or closed-end funds.

The post Dynex: Will This 15% Yield Get Cut Again? appeared first on Wealthy Retirement.

But can the company continue to boost the dividend, or will the dividend jump the tracks?

Trinity has not generated any cash flow for the past three years. The good news is that’s expected to change this year. Wall Street forecasts free cash flow to reach $34 million in 2025 and climb to $51 million next year.

I’ll give credit where credit is due. That’s a massive improvement.

However, it’s not enough to pay the company’s dividend.

This year, Trinity is expected to pay $94 million in dividends – nearly three times as much as it’s projected to generate in cash flow. Next year, dividends paid is anticipated to be $97 million versus $51 million in cash flow, so the company is still paying out more in dividends than it makes in cash flow.

The projected payout ratio (the percentage of cash flow paid out in dividends) of 190% is much better than this year’s 276%. But when the dividend payout is still nearly double the cash flow the company produces, it’s a very concerning sign.

That being said, cash flow problems haven’t stopped the company from raising the dividend in the past. Trinity Industries’ dividend has increased every year for 14 years – even when it was hemorrhaging cash.

So, on the plus side, Trinity is expected to return to being cash flow positive and to continue growing its cash flow this year and next year. Its dividend-raising track record is also impressive. But the payout ratio is too high. Unless it takes out a loan, the company simply can’t afford the dividend it’s been paying – and it hasn’t been able to for years.

While management seems committed to raising the dividend, the payout has to be considered moderately risky.

Dividend Safety Rating: C

What stock’s dividend safety would you like me to analyze next? Leave the ticker in the comments section.

You can also take a look to see whether we’ve written about your favorite stock recently. Just click on the word “Search” at the top right part of the Wealthy Retirement homepage, type in the company name, and hit “Enter.”

Also, keep in mind that Safety Net can analyze only individual stocks, not exchange-traded funds, mutual funds, or closed-end funds.

The post Is Trinity Industries on the Wrong Side of the Tracks? appeared first on Wealthy Retirement.

Part of that total return has been from the company’s dividend yield. The current yield is 3.7%, though Oxford Income Letter subscribers who bought it when it was first recommended are earning over 8% annually on the original price.

Whether you’re earning more than 8% or today’s 3.7% or anything in between, you need to feel confident that the dividend is safe.

Let’s dig in and see if it is.

CareTrust REIT leases nursing homes and assisted and independent living facilities to operators. It has over 400 properties across 35 states and another 130 properties in the U.K.

Because CareTrust is a REIT (real estate investment trust), we use a measure of cash flow called funds from operations, or FFO.

In 2024, FFO grew 66% to $331 million. Over the past three years, it has grown by an average of 17% per year. That’s exceptional.

This year, that growth is forecast to slow to 8%, with FFO coming in at $359 million. In 2026 and 2027, growth is expected to accelerate into the double digits again.

CareTrust REIT paid shareholders $172 million in dividends last year for a payout ratio of just 52%. This year, the projected $189 million in dividend payments should result in a payout ratio of 53%.

So the company generates nearly double the cash flow that it needs in order to pay the dividend. With FFO expected to continue to rise, the company should be able to keep raising the dividend, as it has every year since it began paying one in 2014.

CareTrust REIT has everything you want to see in a Perpetual Dividend Raiser. It has a stellar track record of annual dividend increases, it generates strong cash flow, and it has a low enough payout ratio to ensure that the dividend should remain intact even if the company hits an unexpected obstacle.

It’s no wonder the stock has performed so well over the past several years.

CareTrust REIT’s dividend is very safe.

Dividend Safety Rating: A

What stock’s dividend safety would you like me to analyze next? Leave the ticker in the comments section.

You can also take a look to see whether we’ve written about your favorite stock recently. Just click on the word “Search” at the top right part of the Wealthy Retirement homepage, type in the company name, and hit “Enter.”

Also, keep in mind that Safety Net can analyze only individual stocks, not exchange-traded funds, mutual funds, or closed-end funds.

The post This REIT Continues to Reward Investors appeared first on Wealthy Retirement.